| Numbers I don’t need to see |
Not looking at my account is one of my strategies for dealing with down days. Not because I am ignoring the market or too afraid to look at it; it’s because I don’t want to translate a, say, 1% drop into actual dollar figures.
Why I don’t look at my account
I know that if I do, my brain will immediately convert the loss into everything I could have bought with it: Two months in a beautiful hotel in France …!
That is not useful information. I don’t need it.
What I look at instead
Instead of monitoring account balances, I focus on market mechanics:
- Price Charts: I read the candlesticks, check volume, monitor key SMAs, and track structural patterns (trends, channels, support, resistance, Darvas boxes).
- Intraday Action: Reviewing intraday charts often provides context. A steady upward trend followed by a sudden late-day drop often signals sudden headline news rather than systemic weakness.
- Factual News: I scan headlines strictly for objective data – earnings reports, CPI prints, or macroeconomic updates – to understand the underlying market sentiment.
The idea is to understand what has been going on in investors’ minds.
What I ignore
But what I don’t look at are opinions. There are always heaps of them and they are easy to recognise.
Nvidia Falls 8% After Earnings
This is a headline I would read – it is going to give me facts on what is going on which will help my understanding. On the other hand:
Market crash Imminent!
I won’t read it. It is a prediction dressed up as news, usually written to attract clicks. Adding “expert says” does not turn an opinion into a fact. Don’t rot your brain reading it.
Am I avoiding reality?
No, I don’t think so. It is just me avoiding reality being presented in a way that will make my subconscious become my enemy. OK, maybe enemy is too strong a word. But definitely a very unhelpful friend.
But interestingly, avoiding reality is what people do. But there’s a difference between unconscious avoidance and conscious selective attention.
When investors look away
Research appearing in the Review of Economic Studies in 2026 used brokerage-account data and three experiments to examine when investors paid attention to their portfolios.
The researchers found that investors were more likely to log in when a recently purchased stock had gained than when it had lost. This reluctance to look also affected what they did next. When investors avoided logging in after a loss, they became less likely to buy or sell other stocks – even though those stocks had not caused the original discomfort.
Investors, it seems, are not only reluctant to realise losses. They can also be reluctant simply to look at them.
Discipline? Or denial?
So, am I doing exactly the same thing?
No. There is a vital distinction here.
- Conscious discipline: I have made a conscious decision not to look at an irrelevant dollar figure because I know it can influence my thinking. But I am still looking at the market, checking the evidence and following the ITM
- Unconscious avoidance: When people are hiding from reality. This is not what we do – we keep an eye on the market, trying to understand what is going on, and watching for our ITM signals.
Sometimes refusing to look is avoidance.
Sometimes it is discipline.
The difference is whether you are still paying attention to the information that matters.
To the markets . . .
Not a bad week. Not exactly memorable. But perfectly acceptable.
SPY Charts
SPY seems inclined to stay above the $760 level which is good news. It has had a series of short candles on relatively low volume so it seems that investors are taking a breather – not inclined to push the prices down, but also not enough energy to push them higher.
So, it is drifting sideways – but slightly upwards. The 10-day SMA is pulling away from the 200-day SMA, so it seems a death cross is not imminent.
I really shouldn’t say things like that – tempting fate I always think.
‘The main purpose of the stock market is to make fools of as many men as possible.’
Bernard M. Baruch
I think that includes women too!
On the long term chart, our hope that the top bound would become the new support line seems to be being fulfilled.
Last week I mentioned that perhaps we should, from time to time, look at things on a log scale. A log scale shows equal percentage changes as equal distances, rather than equal dollar changes- so a rise from $50 to $100 looks the same size as a rise from $250 to $500.
So what does this log chart tell us that the previous chart doesn’t?
Not a lot really, apart from the covid bear being much more pronounced. Why is it not much different? Because in the scheme of things 6 years is not that long a time. If we went back 50 or 100 years a log chart would be much more useful.
SPYG Charts
SPYG is crawling along the level of the previous high (once again I am amazed at how accurate simple things like support / resistance lines ca be). As for SPY, the 10-day SMA is pulling away from the 200-day SMA
Longer term SPYG has returned to the upper bound. It would be nice if it pierced it and followed SPY’s pattern.
QQQ Charts
QQQ is trending upwards – slowly and with short candles – heading towards the previous high of $746 on 2nd June. It is possible that we may see resistance at that level – but we’ll have to wait and see.
Longer term it is back above the upper bound – lets hope that it decides to make this it’s new trend line!
Looking at the log chart I don’t think it gives us any more information. See next section for comments.
Vix Chart (Volatility)
Nothing much happening with the VIX – but that’s the way we like it!
Log Charts
I will continue to look at log charts from time to time – definitely when we are examining very long-term trends.
But for the charts we use each week, I want support and resistance levels to be immediately recognisable and visually consistent with the daily charts. A log scale does not remove those price levels, but it changes the spacing between them. That can make familiar levels and trend lines look different and makes it harder to move quickly between the daily and longer-term charts.
Over six years, the log chart does not seem to add enough useful information to compensate for that loss of visual continuity. So I don’t think I will include it regularly – but you can create one whenever you like at HeatherCullen.com/Charts.
ITMeter
The week ahead . . . . .
The main market-moving event is likely to be Wednesday’s release of the July Federal Reserve meeting minutes. Retail earnings will also be important, with Home Depot, Target, Lowe’s and Walmart reporting during the week.
Monday 17 August
Announcements: Empire State Manufacturing Index, NAHB Housing Market Index.
Earnings: Fabrinet.
Tuesday 18 August
Announcements: Building Permits, Housing Starts, Import Prices, Industrial Production, Capacity Utilisation, Pending Home Sales.
Earnings: Home Depot, Baidu, Amer Sports, Keysight Technologies, Toll Brothers.
Wednesday 19 August
Announcements: FOMC Meeting Minutes.
Earnings: Analog Devices, Lowe’s, Target, TJX, Estée Lauder, Bill.com.
Thursday 20 August
Announcements: Weekly Jobless Claims, Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index, Leading Economic Indicators.
Earnings: Walmart, Alibaba, Deere, NetEase, Ross Stores, Advance Auto Parts.
Friday 21 August
Announcements: S&P Global Flash Manufacturing PMI, S&P Global Flash Services PMI.
Earnings: BJ’s Wholesale, Buckle.
The major retailers will provide a useful picture of consumer spending. Home Depot and Lowe’s should also offer evidence about housing-related demand, while Walmart and Target will show how consumers are responding to continuing pressure on household budgets.
Analog Devices and Keysight Technologies will provide further evidence about demand for semiconductors and electronic-testing equipment. Baidu, Alibaba and NetEase may also offer useful indications of spending on AI, cloud services and the Chinese technology market.
The futures . .
The futures look slightly positive – well, tech does. But it is still 11 hours to market open.
Next week . .
I’ve been promising to do a blog on the VIX (often called the fear index) and I will next week. But when thinking about it, it raised the question:
Why isn’t there a greed index?
An interesting question – we’ll see why next blog.
Hoping for a great week!
Heather
Trade the tide- not the waves
One Response
“ fools of as many men as possible.” “ the lemmings “ Somebody should put all of those in a book… or a Peter Lynch on charts. A monkey throwing darts at a newspaper in a bull market. I think the darvis box looks almost like a point and figure chart of X s and O s in the days of old. Have you asked Ai about the future of money • robots and Ai • UBI s. ChatGPT has an opinion on that too . The time between Sunday evening and Monday morning is when I actually read • and look at your charts. Be well!r